Increased Screen Time and Wellbeing Decline in Youth
A) Have young people never had it so good? Or do they face more challenges than any previous generation? Our current era in the West is one of high wealth. This means minors enjoy material benefits and legal protections that would have been the envy of those living in the past. But there is an increasing suspicion that all is not well for our youth. And one of the most popular explanations, among some experts and the popular media, is that excessive & quote; screen time & quote; is to blame. (This refers to all the attention young people devote to their phones, tablets and laptops.) However, this is a contentious theory and such claims have been treated skeptically by some scholars based on their reading of the relevant data.
B) Now a new study has provided another contribution to the debate, uncovering strong evidence that adolescent wellbeing in the United States really is experiencing a decline and arguing that the most likely cause is the electronic riches we have given them. The background to this is that from the 1960s into the early 2000s, measures of average wellbeing went up in the US. This was especially true for younger people. It reflected the fact that these decades saw a climb in general standards of living and avoidance of mass societal traumas like full-scale war or economic deprivation. However, the & quote; screen time & quote; hypothesis, advanced by researchers such as Jean Twenge, is that electronic devices and excessive time spent online may have reversed these trends in recent years, causing problems for young people's psychological health.
C) To investigate, Twenge and her colleagues dived into the & quote; Monitoring the Future & quot; dataset based on annual surveys of American school students from grades 8, 10, and 12 that started in 1991. In total, 1.1 million young people answered various questions related to their wellbeing. Twenge’s team’s analysis of the answers confirmed the earlier, well-established wellbeing climb, with scores rising across the 1990s, and into the later 2000s. This was found across measures like self-esteem, life satisfaction, happiness and satisfaction with individual domains like job, neighborhood, or friends. But around 2012 these measures started to decline. This continued through 2016, the most recent year for which data is available.
D) Twenge and her colleagues wanted to understand why this change in average wellbeing occurred. However, it is very hard to demonstrate causes using non-experimental data such as this. In fact, when Twenge previously used this data to suggest a screen time effect, some commentators were quick to raise this problem. They argued that her causal-sounding claims rested on correlational data, and that she had not adequately accounted for other potential causal factors. This time around, Twenge and her team make a point of saying that they are not trying to establish causes as such, but that they are assessing the plausibility of potential causes.
E) First, they explain that if a given variable is playing a role in affecting wellbeing, then we should expect any change in that variable to correlate with the observed changes in wellbeing. If not, it is not plausible that the variable is a causal factor. So the researchers looked at time spent in a number of activities that could plausibly be driving the wellbeing decline. Less sport, and fewer meetings with peers correlated with lower wellbeing, as did less time reading print media(newspapers) and, surprisingly, less time doing homework .(This last finding would appear to contradict another popular hypothesis that it is our burdening of students with assignments that is causing all the problems.) In addition, more TV watching and more electronic communication both correlated with lower wellbeing. All these effects held true for measures of happiness, life satisfaction and self-esteem, with the effects stronger in the 8th and 10th-graders.
F) Next, Twenge’s team dug a little deeper into the data on screen time. They found that adolescents who spent a very small amount of time on digital devices—a couple of hours a week—had the highest wellbeing. Their wellbeing was even higher than those who never used such devices. However, higher doses of screen time were clearly associated with lower happiness. Those spending 10-19 hours per week on their devices were 41 percent more likely to be unhappy than lower-frequency users. Those who used such devices 40 hours a week or more (one in ten teenagers) were twice as likely to be unhappy. The data was slightly complicated by the fact that there was a tendency for kids who were social in the real world to also use more online communication, but by bracketing out different cases it became clear that the real-world sociality component correlated with greater wellbeing, whereas greater time on screens or online only correlated with poorer wellbeing.
G) So far, so plausible. But the next question is, are the drops in average wellbeing happening at the same time strands toward increased electronic device usage? It looks like it-after all, 2012 was the tipping point when more than half of Americans began owning smartphones. Twenge and her colleagues also found that across the key years of 2013-16, wellbeing was indeed lowest in years where adolescents spent more time online, on social media, and reading news online, and when more youth in the United States had smartphones. And in a second analysis, they found that where technology went, dips in wellbeing followed. For instance, years with a larger increase in online usage were followed by years with lower wellbeing, rather than the other way around. This does not prove causality, but is consistent with it. Meanwhile, TV use did not show this tracking. TV might make you less happy, but this is not what seems to be driving the recent declines in young people's average happiness.
H) A similar but reversed pattern was found for the activities associated with greater wellbeing. For example, years when people spent more time with friends were better years for wellbeing (and followed by better years). Sadly, the data also showed face-to-face socializing and sports activity had declined over the period covered by the survey.
I) There is another explanation that Twenge and her colleagues wanted to address: the impact of the the great recession of 2007-2009, which hit a great number of American families and might be affecting adolescents. The dataset they used did not include economic data, so instead the researchers looked at whether the 2013-16 wellbeing decline was tracking economic indicators. They found some evidence that some crude measures, like income inequality, correlated with changes in wellbeing, but economic measures with a more direct impact, like family income and unemployment rates (which put families into difficulties), had no relationship with wellbeing. The researchers also note that the recession hit some years before we see the beginning of the wellbeing drop, and before the steepest wellbeing decline, which occurred in 2013.
J) The researchers conclude that electronic communication was the only adolescent activity that increased at the same time psychological wellbeing declined. I suspect that some experts in the field will be keen to address alternative explanations, such as unassessed variables playing a role in the wellbeing decline. But the new work does go further than previous research and suggests that screen time should still be considered a potential barrier to young people’s flourishing.
36. The year when most Americans began using smartphones was identified as a turning point in young Americans' level of happiness.
37. Scores in various wellbeing measures began to go downward among young Americans in recent years.
38. Unfortunately, activities involving direct contact with people, which contributed to better wellbeing, were found to be on the decline.
39. In response to past critics, Twenge and her co-researchers stress they are not trying to prove that the use of digital devices reduces young people’s wellbeing.
40. In the last few decades of the 20th century, living standards went up and economic depressions were largely averted in the US.
41. contrary to popular belief, doing homework might add to students’ wellbeing.
42. The author believes the researchers’ new study has gone a step further regarding the impact of screen time on wellbeing.
43. The researchers found that extended screen time makes young people less happy.
44. Data reveals that economic inequality rather than family income might affect people’s wellbeing.
45. Too much screen time is widely believed to be the cause of unhappiness among today’s young people.
答案解析：
36. 由题干中的关键词“most Americans began using smartphones”和“a turning point in young Americans' level of happiness”定位到G段。G段提到“2012 was the tipping point when more than half of Americans began owning smartphones”以及“wellbeing was indeed lowest in years where adolescents spent more time online...and when more youth in the United States had smartphones”，说明2012年大多数美国人开始使用智能手机，这一年也是美国年轻人幸福水平的一个转折点，所以选G。
37. 由题干中的关键词“Scores in various wellbeing measures”和“go downward among young Americans in recent years”定位到C段。C段提到“But around 2012 these measures started to decline. This continued through 2016”，说明近年来美国年轻人在各种幸福指标上的得分开始下降，所以选C。
38. 由题干中的关键词“activities involving direct contact with people”和“on the decline”定位到H段。H段提到“Sadly, the data also showed face - to - face socializing and sports activity had declined over the period covered by the survey”，说明涉及与人直接接触的活动(如面对面社交和体育活动)在调查期间有所下降，而这些活动有助于提升幸福感，所以选H。
39. 由题干中的关键词“In response to past critics”和“not trying to prove that the use of digital devices reduces young people’s wellbeing”定位到D段。D段提到“This time around, Twenge and her team make a point of saying that they are not trying to establish causes as such, but that they are assessing the plausibility of potential causes”，说明Twenge和她的团队强调他们不是在证明数字设备的使用会降低年轻人的幸福感，而是在评估潜在原因的合理性，所以选D。
40. 由题干中的关键词“In the last few decades of the 20th century”和“living standards went up and economic depressions were largely averted in the US”定位到B段。B段提到“from the 1960s into the early 2000s, measures of average wellbeing went up in the US. It reflected the fact that these decades saw a climb in general standards of living and avoidance of mass societal traumas like full - scale war or economic deprivation”，说明在20世纪最后几十年，美国的生活水平提高了，经济萧条在很大程度上得到了避免，所以选B。
41. 由题干中的关键词“Contrary to popular belief”和“doing homework might add to students’ wellbeing”定位到E段。E段提到“less time doing homework...(This last finding would appear to contradict another popular hypothesis that it is our burdening of students with assignments that is causing all the problems)”，说明与普遍看法相反，做作业可能会增加学生的幸福感，所以选E。
42. 由题干中的关键词“The author believes”和“the researchers’ new study has gone a step further regarding the impact of screen time on wellbeing”定位到J段。J段提到“But the new work does go further than previous research and suggests that screen time should still be considered a potential barrier to young people’s flourishing”，说明作者认为研究人员的新研究在屏幕时间对幸福感的影响方面更进了一步，所以选J。
43. 由题干中的关键词“The researchers found”和“extended screen time makes young people less happy”定位到F段。F段提到“higher doses of screen time were clearly associated with lower happiness”，说明研究人员发现长时间的屏幕使用会让年轻人更不快乐，所以选F。
44. 由题干中的关键词“Data reveals”和“economic inequality rather than family income might affect people’s wellbeing”定位到I段。I段提到“They found some evidence that some crude measures, like income inequality, correlated with changes in wellbeing, but economic measures with a more direct impact, like family income and unemployment rates (which put families into difficulties), had no relationship with wellbeing”，说明数据表明经济不平等而不是家庭收入可能会影响人们的幸福感，所以选I。
45. 由题干中的关键词“Too much screen time”和“the cause of unhappiness among today’s young people”定位到A段。A段提到“And one of the most popular explanations, among some experts and the popular media, is that excessive 'screen time' is to blame”，说明很多人认为过多的屏幕时间是导致当今年轻人不快乐的原因，所以选A。
湘公网安备43011202000971号